Land(line, heave) ho!

Sunday, August 9, 2026
With AT&T moving to kill off its landline service in Illinois—after over the years raising its monthly bill for a line we rarely answered from about $30/month to close to $90/month for a line we lately never answer—I chose to jump rather than be pushed.

So the spamsters wouldn’t be lonely and phone book archivists might have a chance to find us, I migrated our longtime (44+ years) analog phone number to a free Google Voice account for a one-time $20 fee. (It was slower and more complicated than that sounds, because it involved first porting the number to a soon-to-die-anyway free-trial Xfinity phone account. But it worked.)

And so I’ve spent the last few days nostalgically unplugging phones stationed around the house and bundling up all … those … cords.

But I won’t unplug the kitchen hutch wall phone that has stored some 50 or so voicemail messages of recent years—many from family now passed—at least until I’ve digitized that audio for posterity.

I’d already saved some of it—somewhere—and seeking that file on my computer using the phrase “answering machine” time-warped me back to June 10, 1992, when I filed this column for the Wednesday Journal of Oak Park and River Forest about our first of these things.
_____

The answering machine: The next best thing to getting it yourself

I hardly ever answer the telephone at home anymore.

Nothing personal, I hope my friends and family understand. I always appreciate hearing from them.

But most of the calls we get these days aren’t for me. Most often the ring—or chirp or however you describe the sound modern phones make—now signals a call for my wife or my kids or my money. It’s just not worth
leaving my wife or my kids or my money to get the phone.

I do answer the phone when everyone is home, awake, not eating, not wearing a poopy diaper and generally available to come to the phone. But that’s rare. Especially the diaper part.

So I let the answering machine get it. Chances are those who want my wife or my kids will leave a more accurate, informative message on the machine than I’d leave in my dilapidated scrawl. And those who want money will find the machine far more hospitable.

If I had my way, we’d set the machine to answer immediately and save callers the trouble of waiting through four ringy-dingies.

But my wife, tied to the old ways, insists on time to answer.

For me, those four rings are torture. Every instinct, forged in the fires of adolescence, screams Answer the phone! But it’s just not like the old days, when the phone brought invitations to adventure or—in the days before my marriage—romance. Or when I had the energy to pursue adventure or romance.

I’m sure some of our acquaintances are insulted to hear a live voice only after they’ve identified themselves to a machine. But, really, they should be flattered I’m abandoning the VC— er, the kids or a good book—to talk to them.

And, as for those whose calls I don’t pick up … Well, maybe we’re really not home, OK?

• Oak Parker Charlie Meyerson is the news director and morning newscaster on WNUA (95.5 FM) in Chicago. His column appears regularly in VIEWPOINTS. [At least when this was published June 17, 1992.]
_____

Back here in 2026, please know that my wife has over the years lost all interest in answering calls to that vintage phone number—but I sometimes enjoy mixing it up with the spam callers.

If you have strong feelings about AT&T’s abandonment of copper-line service—leaving customers reliant on cellular/internet network stability for voice communication—you’ll want to track Illinois legislation that would require the company to give its landline network a five-year reprieve.

Me in 1976—reflecting on 1973: ‘My Watergate views may not be the reason I didn’t get the scholarship, but …’

Wednesday, July 29, 2026
On this date in 1976—50 years ago to the day—I turned in the following paper for a summer term journalism class at the University of Illinois. Honk if you perceive parallels to the media landscape of 2026.


all the president's men review
meyerson
29 july 76
journ 291

REVIEW: All the President's Men, by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward. Warner Paperback Library, 1975. 383 pp.

"O.K., Charles," I muttered as I entered the interview room in April 1973. "A 52-hundred dollar scholarship on the line here. Be cool and calm, and your chances are good."

So I faced the group of seven school-board and faculty officials in that conservative suburb of Chicago and told them I'd been accepted at Princeton, University of Chicago, University of Michigan and Northwestern but I thought instead I'd go to the University of Illinois majoring in journalism.

The questions started.

"A journalist, huh? Well, what do you think about this Watergate business?"

I don't know. Don't know if anyone's done anything wrong, but it seems a healthy process of reevaluation is going on....especially following executive abuses during the Vietnam war.....so, as long as it doesn't get out of hand--

"Don't you think it's gotten out of hand already?" "Isn't this just another witch-hunt, run by the
media this time?" "--a personal vendetta run by the liberal Eastern Establishment?"

No, no--I don't think so. It's important that we have the press around to keep the government in line. The government's still running, and there seems to be evidence that something's gone wrong here--we don't know for sure--so I think the investigation should go on. I'd rather overinvestigate and risk a slight inconvenience for the government than underinvestigate and let what may be major violations of our civil rights go unpunished.

Three or four interviewers nodded. The rest just looked at their notes. The subject changed, and ten minutes later I left the room uneasily.

My Watergate views may not be the reason I didn't get the scholarship, but I wonder--

All the criticism leveled at the media by the Nixon administration cast journalists as the villains in the national melodrama. My heroes--from Clark Kent to Mike Royko to my journalist father--were being fingered as the bad guys…and I was guilty by association.

But All the President's Men reversed the charges.

Most of the President's men have been removed from the White House, his second-string Vice President seems headed for defeat--either in August or November--and Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward (or Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford, if you insist) are folk heroes.

And that's the real value of All the President's Men.

Journalistically, Woodstein did nothing any other good journalist wouldn't have done, given the resources of the Washington Post and Deep Throat. The Arizona Republic's Don Bolles got killed for doing the same job on a different playfield, and there won't be any movies about him.

Not to discount the work of Woodstein: Their book and the resulting film do an intelligent, witty and accurate job of portraying the work of newspeople.

But the best part of All the President's Men is that it's removed most of the dirt dumped on the Fourth Estate during the Nixon years. Journalism schools are overcrowded, journalists are celebrities and aspiring reporters all over the country are asking questions, eyes peeled for future abuses of power.

All of which is fine with me, because, as I sheepishly told that interview panel in 1973, a healthy skepticism is just a small part of keeping the press lively and the nation free.


July 29, 1976, seems to have been a deadline day for that class, because I also turned in a review of six journalism books—concluding: “Surely, the nation faces the greater threat not from this bunch of reporters brandishing studied biases up front but from those who carry the concealed weapons of half-truth, deception and lies.”

Edward R. Murrow 2016 Award-winner: Our glass desk exploded. Yours could, too.

Friday, July 17, 2026

A decade later, I realize that the work that won the team at Rivet a 2016 national Edward R. Murrow Award for audio investigative reporting hasn’t had a place on this website—or in the Meyerson Interviews podcast series.

This oughtta fix that.

Here’s the entry submission:

2016 Edward R. Murrow Awards

Audio Investigative Reporting
Our glass desk exploded. Yours could, too.
Charlie Meyerson, Jonah Meadows, Elizabeth Giadans, Marc Filippino, George Drake Jr.

ABOUT THIS ENTRY: What would you do if, while you were working overnight, a nearby glass desk just … exploded? When it happened to Rivet’s Jonah Meadows and Elizabeth Giadans, we investigated. What we learned surprised us. Because it happens a lot. (Posted to Rivet Nov. 8, 2015.)

ABOUT RIVET RADIO: Rivet Radio provides customizable audio news globally and across platforms. With millions of listeners, Rivet’s cloud is powering consumer, automotive, home, media and business applications. It’s radio reimagined. Rivet was honored last year with the regional and national Radio-Television-Digital News Association Edward R. Murrow Awards for “Best Use of Sound” and a regional Murrow for “Best Online News Organization”; and with the Chicago Headline Club’s Lisagor Awards for “Best Newscast” and “Best Consumer Reporting.” Rivet was named Best Online Startup at the 2013 Lisagors.

Ms. Magazine editor Robin Morgan in 1992: ‘There are no issues that are not women’s issues’

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

I doubt that back in 1972, when I bought the first issue of Ms. Magazine—whose cover featured the iconic declaration “Wonder Woman for President”—I could’ve imagined that a bit more than 20 years later I’d sit down with that magazine’s then-editor-in-chief Robin Morgan to talk about the state of the women’s movement.

At the time, she was promoting her book The Word of a Woman: Feminist Dispatches, 1968-1992.

Few of my archival interviews through the years resonate as much with the current day as this one does—including Morgan’s comments about the downsides of advertiser-compromised news media.

Listening takes me back to a time that was in many ways hopeful—and conjures a parallel universe we never made. And although some of those hopes have yet to materialize, Morgan’s words then suggest we may yet find our way back.

I hope you find this interview, presented here for the first time since its broadcast on WNUA-FM in Chicago on Dec. 13, 1992, as engaging as I do. Hear here.


Shortly after hearing this resurrected recording, Morgan dropped me an email declaring it “a thoughtful, intelligent interview … certainly one of the best interviews I’ve ever done.”

Hear more of my conversations with thought leaders through the years on
this website, in Apple Podcasts, on Spotify or Pandora, via your favorite podcast player and at Chicago Public Square.